Use case

Quote faster and close the loop.
Price with your shop’s DNA.

Today’s quoting still relies on people to predict production costs. With Werk24 + Saphirion, you can measure actual costs, feed them back into pricing, and make the loop self‑correcting. Ideal for shops that repeatedly produce a handful of part families.

The bottleneck in quoting

Manual reading of 2D drawings and gut‑feel costing make quotes slow and inconsistent. Estimators must predict cycle time, setups, scrap, and risk from memory. Under pressure or with mixed experience levels, you see quote variability, margin slippage, and long cycle times.

Closing the loop with measured costs

In most shops today, quoting is still based on estimates and intuition. Actual costs are only reviewed much later by cost control, meaning valuable insights arrive too late to improve the next quote.

A closed loop changes that. Every finished job delivers hard data — machine time, tooling, QA, even scrap — which flows directly back into your pricing model. The system self‑calibrates continuously, so each new part makes the next quote more accurate.

The result: quotes that reflect reality, less reliance on guesswork, and a pricing engine that improves with every order. The same signals also highlight process bottlenecks, helping you refine operations as you refine your prices.

  • Measure actual production cost at job close (time tickets, machine data, tooling, QA, scrap).
  • Feed back automatically into the next quote for similar parts — your model self‑calibrates.
  • Reduce reliance on guesswork: the system learns from real costs instead of only expert intuition.
  • Continuously improve pricing and operations: the same signals that tune price reveal process bottlenecks.
Closed‑loop pricing: quote → production → measured cost → learning
Today vs. Tomorrow — Closing the LoopTop: The estimator predicts costs and cost control provides annual feedback. Bottom: Each newly manufactured part updates pricing automatically.TodayEstimatingProductionRecord actual costsCost controlPredictRecorded after productionAnnual feedbackTomorrowPricing modelProductionActual cost (per job)Auto-learn & updateEach new partupdates immediatelyAutomatic / ContinuousManual / Delayed feedback

Is this for you?

Best fit

  • Manufacturers producing a small set of part families (e.g., turned shafts, milled plates, common subassemblies).
  • Recurring RFQs where features repeat and learning compounds.
  • Desire to codify tribal knowledge and standardize quoting.

Not ideal

  • Every part looks different (pure job‑shop variety with no clustering).
  • No access to actual production costs, or unwillingness to measure them.
Illustration of recurring part families versus one‑offs
Part-family focusGrid highlighting recurring families A and B among mixed parts.Best fitNot idealFamily AFamily BOne-offs

How it works

Start with ~100 representative drawings and their prices/costs. Werk24 structures the data; Saphirion fits an interpretable pricing formula you can audit, iterate, and run in production.

  1. Provide a sample pack You

    Provide ~100 PDFs/scans and the matching historical prices or actual production costs (per part). Use stable, comparable SKUs; avoid bundled/one‑off specials. If variants exist, include quantity and finish.

  2. Extract & normalize Werk24

    Werk24 parses title blocks, GD&T, materials, tolerances, hole tables, finishes, and notes — then returns clean JSON with units and confidence. Includes: dimensions, tolerances, GD&T, materials/specs, operations hints, drawing metadata, surface roughness, and hole/slot tables.

  3. Fit the pricing formula Saphirion

    Train an interpretable model to produce a human‑readable formula with error bands and driver importance.

  4. Detect outliers & gaps Saphirion & You

    Saphirion highlights inconsistent historical prices, missing drivers, extraction anomalies, or under/over‑predictions. Prevents brittle formulas and reveals hidden process drivers that meaningfully shift cost. Requires discussions with your cost engineers.

  5. Review & iterate Saphirion & Werk24 & You

    Fix mappings, add drivers, or drop poor records; refit until KPIs are met.

  6. Integrate & go live You

    Integrate the automated price/cost calculation into your existing processes and tools (e.g., Salesforce).

  7. Close the loop

    Feed actual production cost after job close; the model self‑calibrates and improves the next quote (automated through your existing tools).

Outcomes

Price faster, keep margins disciplined, and explain every number.

  • Automated quoting proposals

    Generate automated quoting proposals for standard parts. Reviewers focus on exceptions and complex parts.

  • Self‑calibrating prices

    Measured production costs feed back automatically to tune the formula.

  • Higher RFQ throughput

    Automated processing absorbs spikes; low‑confidence cases get triaged.

  • Consistent margin discipline

    Guardrails across customers, teams, and sites — no silent discount creep.

  • Traceable rationale

    Every price is explainable — driver weights and an audit trail.

  • Cost‑structure insights

    Understand what drives manufacturing costs.

Metrics that matter

Track the signals that show quoting is not only faster, but also more predictable, competitive, and profitable.

  • Speed: Time‑to‑quote (P50/P90) to prove cycle‑time improvements.
  • Competitiveness: Win rate and price realization vs. target margins.
  • Discipline: Gross‑margin variance across estimators, sites, or teams.
  • Accuracy: Quote‑to‑actual cost delta — should steadily trend toward zero.
  • Model health: Forecast accuracy (MAPE) and human override rate.

FAQ

Is this suitable if every part is unique?
It works best when you repeatedly quote a few part families. If every part is a one‑off with no clustering, the model cannot learn effectively. We’ll help you assess family structure in your RFQ portfolio.
How is our company DNA reflected in the price?
Two shops can manufacture the same part with different setups, machines, and QA. Your formula or Saphirion’s model weights the drivers that matter in your environment (setup vs. cycle vs. tooling vs. QA), so price reflects how you build parts.
What closes the loop?
Instrument your production process to capture actual costs per job. That data flows back to pricing for the next similar part. Over time, the quote‑to‑actual gap shrinks and confidence rises.
Where does the data live?
Within your tenant. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest. Access is role‑based and auditable.